When I think of an 'artist' I don't think of someone who can make an accurate representation of something, I think of someone who can make a creative representation of something. I'm not sure if that's what the dictionary definition says, but, I mean, is just replicating an image really art?

I think Hitler's "art" says a lot about him. He's not exactly an outside-of-the-box painter. He pays high attention to detail - there are so many little intricacies in a lot of his paintings. I don't find a lot of them to have much feeling - they just are what they are------or rather, are what they are of - and that's it. . .

This is a cool thread.